Team Members Present: D. Lynch, R. Schaeffer, G. Brey, P. Sable, R. Mayrhofer, B. Wlazelek, K. McCloskey, R. Flatley, K. Johnston

Unable to Attend: J. Chernekoff, L. Goldberg, W. Mowder

1. Welcome

• Dr. Lynch welcomed approximately 15 faculty members. The team introduced themselves.

2. Discussion of Diversity Goal

• Dialogue from Faculty:
  • How diverse is diverse?
  • We’re not in agreement on the word diverse.
  • Diversity includes a lot of different things.
  • Alternative names have been discussed for this goal.
  • Diverse carries a lot of baggage. Team settled for human diversity because it is a well recognized term.
  • Human engagement and engagement with the world were also discussed.
  • How could we assess goal? Happy with the language, but don’t know how it will be measured.
  • Add more language – make it inclusive.
  • Leave 2nd sentence out. Have problem with the term race; based on research, when you list terms, you create problems. Leave human diversity open to a variety of interpretations.
  • The word race is offensive, has no meaning.
  • Ethnicity a better word?
  • A variety of races represent one ethnicity.
  • Disagrees with Kim, leave term race out, leave all terms out.
  • Race is socially real.
  • Leave terms in. Patrick Beckman’s "Decline of the West" the world is changing; identify as may groups as possible.
  • Diversity denotes many things. Trying to create experiences for students to celebrate the differences.
  • Change human diversity to human condition?
  • Keep words in; terminology is used in society; affective word should be added (empathy or appreciation).
  • Inter-subjectivity.
  • No goals stand in isolation.
  • Words approved by other documents used by the university and state system; want to be on the leading edge not bleeding edge.

3. Implementation

• Dialogue from Faculty:
  • Where do we cut diversity?
  • Difficult to think about implementation without getting a sense of background discussions.
  • Committee hasn’t discussed a change in governance system.
  • Team is listening to all ideas.
  • Mission; goals; core values.
  • Struggle with the word "intensive."
  • UCC approval.
  • Curriculum is incrusted by faculty.
  • Gen. Ed. is not major specific.
  • Gen Ed. model should enable students to broaden their integrating diversity.
  • Strand important; repeated connective experiences.
  • Want Gen. Ed. to be very broad. How many credits will Gen. Ed. have?
  • State requirements are 40%.

4. Closing

Return to MINUTES