Hearings

Student Conduct Hearings

When there is an allegation of misconduct that is challenged, a hearing authority is convened and tasked with the following objectives:      

  1. Find out what happened. (investigation/hearing)
  2. Figure out whether any student violated University policy or rules. (responsible or not responsible)
  3. Decide what to do about it. (sanctioning)

The following resolution pathways are available to resolve an allegation of Student Code of Conduct violations. 

  • Administrative Hearing

    Administrative Hearing:  Hearings are informal and not recorded. A single Hearing Officer facilitates a review of the evidence and acts as the decisionmaker. Administrative Hearings are used for minor to moderate-level cases. Cases that may result in a suspension or dismissal from the university will be heard as a formal hearing by a University Conduct Board.   

  • University Conduct Board Hearing

    University Conduct Board (UCB): Formal UCB hearings are structured and recorded proceedings where both parties to a case may enter testimony and question witnesses appearing at the hearing. Typically, a UCB consists of three members who may be any combination of trained faculty, staff, and students.

    Consistent with the Student Code of Conduct, cases that may result in the possibility of a disciplinary suspension or dismissal will be held as formal hearings by a University Conduct Board.

  • Informal Resolution

    A student has the option to waive their right to a hearing and have their case decided informally by their case officer. In waiving their right to a hearing, the respondent may not appeal the finding of responsibility but may appeal the sanction consistent with the Appeal Policy.

    In cases that may result in a suspension or dismissal from the university, informal resolution is not available.